• Group Reading UNEP Pamphlet

 

Oil and War: An Exchange


Publisher: Security Studies

Author(s): Jeff D. Colgan

Date: 2021

Topics: Assessment, Extractive Resources, Governance, Monitoring and Evaluation

Countries: Iran, Iraq

View Original

Hye Ryeon Jang and Benjamin Smith argue in their article “Pax Petrolica? Rethinking the Oil–Interstate War Linkage” that, when reexamined, the historical data are “more supportive of petro-peace than of petro-aggression.”1 Their argument is a direct critique of my research on that topic, which includes my book Petro-Aggression: When Oil Causes War.2 They have a number of concerns, but their central claim is that “the Iran–Iraq War is singularly responsible for what was believed to have been a radical petro-aggression effect globally.”3 In various statistical models, they add a dummy variable for the eighteen country-year observations associated with the Iran–Iraq War (1980–88) and argue that this reveals a key variable from my research to be statistically insignificant. The key variable is petro-revolutionary, a dichotomous indicator for a state that is both a “petrostate” (defined as a state with net oil exports of at least 10% of gross domestic product (GDP)) and has a revolutionary government. The tendency of petro-revolutionary states to instigate interstate conflicts at a high rate is the phenomenon I label “petro-aggression.”